时间:2020-09-02 来源:深圳维创信息技术 0
Didi argued the case should have been heard inspecialized IPR courts. However, the Chaoyangcourt rejected that appeal. 滴滴称,朝阳法院不具备审理此案的管辖权,此案应由专门的知识产权法院审理,但朝阳法院驳回了滴滴提出的上诉。
Seven Didi employees, who had recently moved to the company from AutoNavi, allegedlyprovided Didi with AutoNavi trade secrets. 近期从高德跳槽至滴滴的七名员工据称向滴滴提供了高德的商业机密。
AutoNavi provides mapping and other navigation-based services, which Didi also uses in itsride-hailing services. 高德提供的地图以及其他基于导航的服务也被滴滴用于其网约车服务中。
Didi is also accused of engaging in unfair business competition through false orexaggerated publicity. 此外,滴滴还被诉通过虚假或夸大宣传进行不公平商业竞争。
AutoNavi was acquired by Alibaba Group in 2014. 高德是于2014年被阿里巴巴集团收购的。
上一篇:信息安全的“抓与护”
下一篇:信息安全的“抓与护”